She turned around and saw Jesus
standing there, and did not know that it was Jesus. (John 20:14)
I am going to take a risk today by
talking about some of the things I sense I am finding in this
chapter. I know it might be very unpopular to say what sounds like
negative observations about Mary, but at the same time it also gives
me hope. Let me explain.
In this story John seems to be focusing
on the issue of how much evidence it takes to get each person to
believe the resurrection of Jesus. Each person is coming from their
own perspective and bringing their own baggage to the very same facts
in the story which in turn affects how much evidence it requires to
induce them to begin trusting God.
In verse 8 John says that when he
entered the tomb right after Peter seeing the same things Peter saw,
he himself believed, though he couldn't yet say the same for Peter.
He is also careful to note that his own belief was not yet founded on
Scripture evidence which I find rather interesting. He is sharing his
own experience of belief with us, relating that although he had not
yet put all the pieces together, he had enough evidence to move him
from unbelief into trust.
I wonder if maybe the previous words of
Jesus suddenly came back into his memory, words not that long ago
spoken to all of the disciples about dying and raising Himself up
again, that had gone right over their heads at the time. Maybe for
John it suddenly clicked that the repeated expressions of Jesus
needed to be taken seriously after all and that everything he was now
seeing and experiencing were demonstration of what Jesus had been
saying all along. For John, the evidence had become clear enough for
him to choose to believe Jesus and trust that although everything
still didn't make total sense that Jesus' words could be trusted and
that He had indeed accomplished what He said He would. That sounds
very much like the experience of Abraham come to think of it.
By faith Abraham, when he was
tested, offered up Isaac, and he who had received the promises was
offering up his only begotten son; it was he to whom it was said, "in
Isaac your descendants shall be called." He considered that God
is able to raise people even from the dead, from which he also
received him back as a type. (Hebrews 11:17-19)
For what does the Scripture say?
"Abraham believed God, and it was credited to him as
righteousness." Now to the one who works, his wage is not
credited as a favor, but as what is due. But to the one who does not
work, but believes in Him who justifies the ungodly, his faith is
credited as righteousness. (Romans 4:3-5)
For Mary however, it seems that her
grief was so intense that she had gotten trapped by her emotions. She
remained stuck in her initial interpretation of the evidence so that
everything saw after that was forced to fit her original assumption,
no matter how contradictory it might be. When she first arrived at
the tomb where there should have been a number of callous soldiers
and a large heavy stone blocking access to the tomb, she found
everything very different with no soldiers and the large stone lying
away from the mouth of the tomb.
Her immediate conclusion about this
unexpected situation was that someone had taken the body of Jesus out
of the tomb and moved it somewhere else. Maybe in her emotion she
thought they had done this just to spite her personally, I don't
know. Emotions can distort a person's logic quite easily. We can
become so self-focused in our desire to escape our pain that we can
interpret everything to assume the whole world is bent on making our
life as miserable as possible even if none of our conclusions fit the
evidence. This is not unusual for a very immature person to do, but
trauma can also have a way of causing us to revert into temporary
immaturity in the ways we perceive reality.
Based on her emotions and the startling
evidence she first came across, she must have concluded that indeed
someone – likely her enemies and of Jesus – were bent on
perpetuating the tragedy that had just taken place and had
intentionally removed His body for spiteful reasons including a
desire to make her grief even more unbearable. With this or some
similar potential scenario entrenched in her thinking, everything she
encountered after that was forced into this scenario created by her
own imagination.
So she ran and came to Simon Peter
and to the other disciple whom Jesus loved, and said to them, "They
have taken away the Lord out of the tomb, and we
do not know where they have laid Him."
(vs 2)
And they (two
angels) said to her, "Woman, why are you weeping?"
She said to them, "Because they have taken away
my Lord, and I do not know where they have laid
Him." (vs 13)
Jesus said to her, "Woman, why
are you weeping? Whom are you seeking?" Supposing Him to be the
gardener, she said to Him, "Sir, if you have carried
Him away, tell me where you have laid Him, and I
will take Him away." (vs 15)
It is becoming quite popular to point
out the fact that Jesus appointed a woman to be the very first
evangelist to tell others of His resurrection. I will not argue that
fact. However, sometimes I wonder if the agenda behind such
statements, evidently meant to counterbalance prejudice against women
being involved in spreading the gospel with equal authority as men,
has not been to overbalance a problem by creating a new one. It is
easy to point out the obvious lack of belief on the part of most of
the men in this story while highlighting the fact that the women
seemed ready to believe. But what I am finding here does not
necessarily support that supposition.
I have come to realize over recent
years that sin at its core has to do with distrust, unbelief in the
real truth about God and in God Himself rather than so much about
'doing bad things' or breaking rules. Dysfunctional behavior that we
generally call sin is symptomatic of everyone who does not trust in
God and in His ways. And like all symptoms, the only real way to
effectively address them is not through focusing primarily on
treating the symptoms but in treating the core causes of the
symptoms. Treating causes rather than effect is far more effective
though maybe not so popular with those who just want the pain and
discomfort to stop immediately.
Given that our problem with sin has
more to do with unbelief than with doing bad things, I am starting to
see in this story that in essence Mary is 'living in sin' in her
relationship to Jesus. I do not say this to denigrate her or shame
her for being emotional. But the fact is that when she first sees the
empty tomb, she jumps to a conclusion that someone must have it in
for her and has taken away the body of Jesus and all she can think
about is finding it again. She only wants to locate His body so she
can grieve over it in person which she hopes will lessen her deep
anguish. Because of this, everything that happens from that point on
is forced through this conclusion that she is unwilling to reconsider
no matter how much the mounting evidence challenges her assumption.
Think about this: she sees angels where
the men only see grave cloths. Yet even with this supernatural clue
and her dialog with angels, she still is not jolted out of her
original assumption. (The experience of Balaam comes to mind.) Then
she meets Jesus Himself who is seeking to help her reconsider her
perception of reality; yet even with Jesus standing right in front of
her all she can perceive is someone who might be the guilty 'they'
that has to fit into her thinking.
This has the hallmarks of intensely
embedded unbelief. I do not say this to be harsh, but with
overwhelming evidence in front of her like this, most people would
have by this time begun to question their original assumptions and
consider that maybe they should consider a more consistent
explanation. But again, intense emotional trauma can so narrow the
focus of one's thinking that it is impossible for them to reconsider
their original assumptions. Then anyone questioning them is
challenged instead of honestly listened to with an open mind.
But here is where I see the good news
appearing once again. But where sin abounded, grace abounded much
more. (Romans 5:20 NKJV)
Let's just face the truth here; by her
unbelief Mary was stuck in sin, for sin is unbelief. This is
not to condemn her but to just be honest about what so many of us
experience at times. We struggle to believe in God, not so much
because we are rebellious but because we simply are unwilling to
challenge our own perceptions of reality that are strongly controlled
by our own emotions. Mary was unable to believe in spite of
overwhelming evidence that for others might have easily caused them
to believe in what was becoming so obvious. But in spite of this
great obstacle of unbelief caused by the pain in Mary's heart, Jesus
never became impatient with her or even rebuked her like He later did
with Thomas. He simply kept bringing more and more evidence to her
until she finally broke through the veil and into the glorious light
of the truth about what God had in His heart for her.
It is no surprise then that the
intensity of her joy was at least in proportion to the level of her
previous grief. That is what can happen with high emotion-capacity
people. What encourages me is when I think of another well known
evangelist who had an experience not unlike that of Mary, though with
a very different background. Saul of Tarsus was also a deeply
passionate person with very intense emotions directed at vindicating
the reputation of God as he understood Him to be. Saul was not
persecuting Christian's out of rebellion against God but out of an
intense desire to protect His reputation and purify His chosen people
of dangerous errors.
In Saul's case, the evidence was also
mounting over time creating increasing emotional pressure to
reconsider his own assumptions. But he too kept resisting until, not
unlike in Mary's situation, Jesus Himself had to get right in his
face in such an obvious way that he couldn't miss it anymore. But in
both cases, after they encountered the real Jesus – the true
revelation of what God is really like and how much love and grace He
has for each one of us – the switch from unbelief to passionate
devotion marked their life from that point on.
God works with each one of us
differently, for we each are coming from unique situations that have
shaped us in very different ways. God does not become impatient with
us when we cling to our unbelief long after others may have embraced
the light and love waiting for us. But at the same time, we are
individually free to keep living in unbelief even while we are
encouraged to begin experiencing the joy of living in belief as soon
as we are willing. The choice is our own, but the consequences of
those choices can be eternal.
Mary might have believed much sooner if
she had been willing to think past her emotions. She already had a
long history of growing faith in her relationship with Jesus and in
some respects already had far more evidence in her own life that many
people do. Her own brother had been raised from the dead just days
before all of this took place and he was likely even then at home
with her sister possibly praying for her. I ponder what may have
taken place that weekend in the home of Mary and Martha and Lazarus
as Mary was consumed by her depression over the death of Jesus. Her
own brother, living testimony of the power of Jesus to raise the
dead, may himself have even found it impossible to break through the
dark cloud surrounding Mary's heart. In addition the faith of her
sister who had discussed this very issue with Jesus only days before
and had chosen to trust Him just before the resurrection of her own
brother – even that could not counteract the intense sadness of
Mary. And amazingly, not even angels seeking to awaken her faith or
even some curiosity in her could pull her away from her unbelief and
her preconceived opinions about what was going on.
Yes, Mary did become the first
evangelist to tell the story of the resurrection to others. But not
until her high level of resistance was first overcome by an
overwhelming amount of evidence. John had chosen to believe with far
less evidence as did many others. Yet with each of them God dealt
with them according to their own uniqueness as He drew them together
into a body of caring believers.
Indeed, where sin (unbelief) abounds,
grace much more abounds. And that pretty much describes the essence
of Jesus – abounding grace personified.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank-you for leaving a comment. Let me know how you feel about what you are reading. This is where I share my personal thoughts and feelings about whatever I am studying in the Word at this time and I relish your input.