Now on the first day of the week
Mary Magdalene came early to the tomb, while it was still dark, and
saw the stone already taken away from the tomb. So she ran and came
to Simon Peter and to the other disciple whom Jesus loved, and said
to them, "They have taken away the Lord out of the tomb, and we
do not know where they have laid Him." (John 20:1-2)
A number of questions rise up in my
mind and heart as I read these verses.
Why did John make sure he identified
exactly who the woman was here?
Why did she go directly to Peter and
John specifically?
What was the circumstantial evidence
that caused her to make the assumptions she did?
Why did she feel compelled to talk to
Peter and John? What did she think they could do about it?
Whom did she have in mind in her last
statement here with the pronouns they and we?
Mary goes early to the tomb, very
early, while it is still dark. What prompted her to do this?
Certainly she must have been aware that
there was a squad of burley soldiers camped around the tomb to
prevent anyone from even getting close to it. So why did she go there
anyway?
Sensing a little of Mary's insatiable
passion for Jesus as well as the intensity of her grief over losing
her best Friend in such a traumatic way, I doubt that she was
operating very much on logic or reason at this point. And besides
that, being a man myself it is nearly impossible for me to appreciate
much of the way a woman, a very unusual woman at that, might feel and
think under such circumstances. Yet I don't think it is wrong for me
to try to get as far as possible into her mind and heart, for God has
created in all of us at least some capacity for empathy with others,
even those strikingly different than ourselves, if we will only open
our hearts and minds to things outside our own perspective and let
His Spirit empower us to share what others are feeling and seeing.
I suspect that Mary, along with many
others that weekend, had likely not gotten much sleep at all. Most of
the disciples, the men mostly, were so filled with a growing fear for
their own safety that they likely had a very hard time sleeping. On
the other hand, the women, and Mary especially, may have had very
different emotions controlling their thinking and behavior. In my
mind, Mary in particular seemed to have an inside track to the heart
of Jesus. Her view of and relationship with Him seemed to go far
beyond the intellectual attachment that most of the disciples seemed
to maintain and even went far beyond what possibly anyone else had
ever experienced.
Mary had a long history with Jesus, and
a rather colorful one at that. Evidence indicates that she had be
delivered from at least seven demons, and probably this didn't happen
all at the same time. Her reputation was so vivid and public as an
outcast but very attractive prostitute that it was impossible to not
know who she was with most of the people in these stories. Even the
soldiers involved in the crucifixion may likely have had previous
encounters with her or had at least known others who had. So when
Mary showed up at the cross openly supportive of Jesus, the
inferences about their relationship could not be overlooked by a
crowd eager to discredit Him.
As is very often the case, even after a
public conversion such as Mary experienced, people of this reputation
or other similar ones find it nearly impossible to have their own
reputations altered in public opinion, either in or outside the group
of people claiming to follow God. As the philosophy of AA insists
(though I challenge its validity strongly), once a problem has taken
over one's life and given them its identity, they must always view
themselves with that identity. Once an alcoholic always an
alcoholic, even if one never takes another drink. And the same
kind of logic applies in some people's thinking about a loose woman.
While there may be good reasons to be extra careful and on guard and
be willing to always acknowledge one's weaknesses, I believe there
should come a point when both the person themselves and true
God-followers around them must allow the new identity of Jesus to
preempt the reputation of any sinner that once marked their previous
life. But I digress a little here.
Assuming that Mary was so distraught
that she likely could not sleep much that night, she for whatever
reason decides to the risk of venturing to get close to the tomb
where her absolute best Friend has been laid after a very cruel
death. The memories of the abuse and shame that Jesus had suffered
the last few hours of His life were vividly circulating in her mind
and she simply loved Him too much to stay away despite any dangers
that might be involved in getting close to Him. After all, there was
a dangerous group of uncouth men stationed around His tomb, and it
also was very late at night. But in spite of all this, she must have
decided that it was worth the risk to be misunderstood or even suffer
abuse herself if only she could just be close to where His body was
lying in the grave.
This may have been at least some of the
context of what was going on in her thinking as she gave up any
further attempts to rest and slipped through the night toward where
the soldiers were stationed watching for any suspicious intruders. I
wonder – did she encounter any of the fleeing soldiers as they
raced toward the city early that morning in terror after encountering
messengers from outer space, interrupting their orders from earthly
authorities? Or did her timing miss all the excitement? Did she feel
the earthquake when the angel confronted the soldiers, overwhelmed
them with the glory of God and knocked the heavy stone away from the
opening like a pebble only to sit on it in triumph? We don't know
exactly what she experienced or missed along the way.
I wonder if maybe she had finally
fallen into a fitful sleep that night only to be awakened by the
earthquake. I suspect possibly most people in the area may have felt
the earthquake and had been jolted awake with more terror. An
earthquake had marked the death of Jesus striking fear and foreboding
into the hearts of many of His enemies. Now another earthquake rocks
the countryside as again God intervenes in the diabolical plans of
His enemies to confirm some of the most important evidence
vindicating His reputation by calling Jesus to raise Himself up and
leave the tomb victorious over death. This earthquake likely struck
fear in nearly every human who experienced it, yet from heaven's
perspective it was more like the triumphal singing that the shepherds
listened to at His birth that also produced a lot of fear. Yet each
time it was actually a celebration of God's emerging victory over the
lies and works of His archenemy that have caused so much havoc
throughout the universe.
We have little idea where Mary was
coming from. Did she go back to Bethany to her home over the Sabbath?
That would make sense since it was not all that far from Jerusalem
where all of this was taking place. Most likely she would not have
been allowed to stay with the disciples overnight as they cowered in
the upper room, yet she seemed quite aware of their whereabouts. So
if she was coming from her home in Bethany and had decided to go to
the tomb after being jolted awake by the earthquake, that might imply
that all the commotion with the soldiers being humiliated and fleeing
from their post of duty had all been completed before she would have
arrived from that distance.
From the accounts of several writers,
Mary seemed to be operating alone at this time. She did not come
together with other women, though their timing may have not been too
far apart. I would suspect that the other women involved shared many
of Mary's emotions, all rather different from what the men were
focused on at the time. In this time of crisis it appears clear that
it was only the women who seemed fearless enough to go to the tomb
despite all the intimidations created by the chauvinistic authorities
of the political systems in power. It was only the women who were
willing to act from their hearts and take risks both physically and
even with their reputations to come to the tomb to see what they
might be able to accomplish out of love for their Beloved Friend no
matter what they might encounter there. But the stories seem to
indicate that Mary had not coordinated her plans with anyone else but
was simply acting from her own heart irregardless of what her head
might deem prudent.
But then isn't this just like Mary to
do anyway? Anyone familiar with most of the stories of her encounters
with Jesus could easily see that pattern in Mary's life. In my
thinking Mary was a woman of women, not in that she was virtuous and
graceful but that she was so attractive and had such natural
magnetism that she easily became a prime target for all who were weak
toward the temptations to exploit such vulnerabilities. I have
occasionally seen women who reminded me of what I think Mary must
have been like, not in that they were loose or seductive
intentionally, but women who had such a brilliant sparkle in their
eyes and a natural, even unconscious magnetism about their very
presence that they were like a powerful drug affecting nearly every
male who encountered them.
Many view this kind of attraction as
sinful, but I don't buy that line. I believe that God endowed the
female side of our species with attractions that are designed to
complement the male side in such a way as to bond the two together
inseparably when both are living in God's plan for their lives. Sin
has so distorted our thinking and perverted our assumptions that much
of what God designed to be experienced as intense pleasure and joy in
His family is now viewed largely as coming from Satan. This is very
sad but is most often reinforced by religion everywhere.
Jesus' reputation had been increasingly
tarnished by His free and open association with Mary, allowing her
access to His presence in violation of many of the traditions of
culture. He scandalized even some of His own followers by going so
far as to vigorously defend her impulsive, shocking outbursts of
intimate affection even on His body. Jesus knew that by allowing this
woman of ill-repute to openly shower Him with love and affection in
public, that He was creating enormous potential for doubt that would
only reinforce insinuations about His own character. Yet He did it
anyway, for in the kingdom of heaven what is considered most valuable
is often at very sharp odds with what we consider highest priorities.
I am not sure what jarred Mary out of
her fear and musings when she stumbled upon the tomb and found it
both unguarded and abandoned, but also with the large, heavy stone
that promised to keep her away from the body of her Beloved lying
completely away from the opening to the tomb. Everything that she had
expected to find was missing or out of place. How was she to
interpret all of this shocking evidence? What was she to make of
this? Being much more emotional than rational as she was, it is hard
to determine just what went through her mind at that moment.
But then again, maybe that is why she
decided to go get some of her most trusted male friends involved in
this new mystery. Maybe she assumed they might be able to think more
clearly or might have important additional information that could
explain all these developments.
According to her excited but distressed
exclamations to Peter and John, she assumed that someone, maybe the
soldiers or the diabolical, plotting authorities who had initiated
all of this tragedy to start with, must have removed the body of
Jesus, possibly to confuse or even further distress His followers.
She may have assumed that they had decided it was not enough
to simply torture and shame and kill the Man who had done so much to
salvage and restore love into her life and had saved so many others;
now they had to add insult to injury by playing engaging in even more
evil politics and 'turn the knife' so to speak by insulting or hiding
the dead body of their beloved Master.
What did she think Peter and John might
do about it? Maybe she didn't have any idea what they might do but
was simply acting out of intensified grief and desperation. But I
also wonder if she had not originally desired to speak only to John
alone as she may have come to feel that he was a most sensitive
disciple among the twelve that she could trust with her heart without
fear of being shamed. But when she arrived to find John, she found
that he was acting like Jesus, by not allowing a severely depressed
Peter out of his presence to possibly commit suicide. I have long
believed that Peter was so depressed by his denial of Jesus that the
other disciples had to take the initiative to watch him very closely
for a time lest he slip away and take his own life like Judas had
done. That's my personal opinion anyway and it seems to be
corroborated by some of the evidence I have examined elsewhere.
So now Mary has to spill her guts to
both Peter and John even though I suspect she didn't completely
comfortable with the rather reactive Peter but had little choice by
this time. But as is often the case, when looking back we see that
God has details carefully planned in amazing ways we might never
think of doing. Maybe Peter needed to get his mind off himself and
awaken his heart to an awareness of how others were feeling or even
get in touch with his own deep affection for Jesus that he had long
kept suppressed under chauvinistic fears. Maybe Peter and Mary
perfectly complimented each other at this time and God knew that both
of them could be just what the other needed in that moment.
There is of course, much more to this
story filled with excitement and drama. But I want to stop here and
encourage my own heart to marinate in these thoughts to allow them to
continue the transformation that I need to keep experiencing. I have
many times been jealous of Mary and her ability to be so open,
affectionate and transparent. Yet I know that my own fears and even
maleness prevents me from living in that way readily.
Instead, I find myself much closer to
being able to identify with the brash and impulsive Peter, though I
don't think I am usually quite as outspoken as he often was. But I am
certainly capable. At the same time I long to enter into the kind of
intimacy and deep appreciation for the passionate love of Jesus that
John seems to have acquired. So far I feel like I have only caught
hints of what it must be like to feel the way John and Mary did about
Jesus. And yet I also sense that sooner or later all of God's true
children must enter into something like what these two enjoyed if we
are ever to be prepared to live in the (dangerous) intensity of the
kind of passionate love He has for each one of us. I pray and plead
with God to heal my own heart so that I can quit resisting His
transforming work in my life and draw me into the kind of passion
that I catch a glimpse of occasionally in these stories from His
friends in the past.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank-you for leaving a comment. Let me know how you feel about what you are reading. This is where I share my personal thoughts and feelings about whatever I am studying in the Word at this time and I relish your input.